(no subject)
Sep. 1st, 2010 11:44 amSo, LJ's latest fail!
I don't lock my posts very often, since if I want something to be private I just don't usually need to post it. But when I do, it's nearly always something intensely personal and, you know, not something I want splashed all over someone's facebook.
And it apparently is very easy to click on accidentally, and it gives a link to the post in question. Great.
Also, LJ has disallowed the use of the / character in tags. Bye-bye, everyone's ship tags~
In related news, I have nineteen Dreamwidth codes for anyone who wants them. :)
(Actually, I'm considering moving all my actual posting over to DW, and just retaining this LJ for commenting purposes. Thoughts?)
I don't lock my posts very often, since if I want something to be private I just don't usually need to post it. But when I do, it's nearly always something intensely personal and, you know, not something I want splashed all over someone's facebook.
And it apparently is very easy to click on accidentally, and it gives a link to the post in question. Great.
Also, LJ has disallowed the use of the / character in tags. Bye-bye, everyone's ship tags~
In related news, I have nineteen Dreamwidth codes for anyone who wants them. :)
(Actually, I'm considering moving all my actual posting over to DW, and just retaining this LJ for commenting purposes. Thoughts?)
no subject
Date: 2010-09-02 03:01 am (UTC)I do wonder if LJ thinks their decisions through at all before they implement them. Lately, it seems not. At least they're backpedaling successfully? (Incidentally, pingbacks still show ~600 characters around the link, from a locked post or otherwise. Not cool, LJ. Really not cool.)
no subject
Date: 2010-09-02 03:08 am (UTC)Yeah, it appears LJ never thinks through their new implementations; that's what pisses me off the most about this debacle.
A friend of mine has injected some much needed sanity into the conversation (http://eska-rina.livejournal.com/660229.html); I'm linking it because it's good food for thought, even though she's still kinda missing the point.
no subject
Date: 2010-09-02 02:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-02 04:03 pm (UTC)I don't quite get the level of annoyance at this new feature myself, but this point is the one thing that keeps me frustrated at LJ. They constantly implement poor decisions, get roundly abused, and then backpedal awkwardly. I GUESS you can use this as a business model - one thing about being based around social networks is that people don't want to leave each other behind, and so end up sticking with the business - but it's so stupid!