(no subject)
Jul. 21st, 2012 06:47 pmReading " 'her secret, defenseless self' – strong female characters", my own reaction to this trope:
Secretly defenseless outwardly strong ladies is not a new trope, and it is not a good one. MEMO: ladies are never secretly defenseless. their secret inner core is made of steel and adamant, not squishy stuff. There is no room to be secretly defenseless in a society that presumes you are without defenses from the beginning. When you strip away the tough outer shell, inside you find . . . more toughness. Women are made of ice and knives, women are not secretly sweet vulnerable flowers they are monsters. just like everyone.
(Example: Neon Genesis Evangelion's Asuka. Her tough facade is there to cover up a ton of problems, but when you get past it she will not cry on your shoulder, she will FUCK YOU UP because she is fucked up and she's angry you can see that. Real vulnerability is not something she accepts, and I think that goes for most people who act like that.)
--
Whenever I'm reading a dudeslash fic and some awful drama goes down, I always say to myself "This wouldn't happen if you were ladies!" and I've only recently worked out that I say this not because ladies are better or because ladies don't have drama, but rather because the people who write ladyslash fic are not the kind of people who put up with stupid drama when they could be writing about cool things instead.
What I mean to say here is that you never see the "lack of communication causes AWFUL LOVE TRIANGLE MISUNDERSTANDING" plot in ladyslash fic.
Secretly defenseless outwardly strong ladies is not a new trope, and it is not a good one. MEMO: ladies are never secretly defenseless. their secret inner core is made of steel and adamant, not squishy stuff. There is no room to be secretly defenseless in a society that presumes you are without defenses from the beginning. When you strip away the tough outer shell, inside you find . . . more toughness. Women are made of ice and knives, women are not secretly sweet vulnerable flowers they are monsters. just like everyone.
(Example: Neon Genesis Evangelion's Asuka. Her tough facade is there to cover up a ton of problems, but when you get past it she will not cry on your shoulder, she will FUCK YOU UP because she is fucked up and she's angry you can see that. Real vulnerability is not something she accepts, and I think that goes for most people who act like that.)
--
Whenever I'm reading a dudeslash fic and some awful drama goes down, I always say to myself "This wouldn't happen if you were ladies!" and I've only recently worked out that I say this not because ladies are better or because ladies don't have drama, but rather because the people who write ladyslash fic are not the kind of people who put up with stupid drama when they could be writing about cool things instead.
What I mean to say here is that you never see the "lack of communication causes AWFUL LOVE TRIANGLE MISUNDERSTANDING" plot in ladyslash fic.
no subject
Date: 2012-07-22 01:00 am (UTC)I think Azula is supposed to be one of these secretly defenseless outwardly strong ladies--I have Complicated Feelings about her arc. Disability as a
thank you, the universe!helping hand to the protagonists is like, NO OMG NO. Also, a criticism that I didn't originally think of is that she's an example of the trope where a woman with power goes mad because she can't handle it. (I would argue that the actual crisis was because her power was taken away, but that trope is still in play.)*ponders some moar*
Also, I really need to watch Evangelion. I have a feeling I would like Asuka--or love her, at least.
no subject
Date: 2012-07-22 01:49 am (UTC)There are all sorts of problematic things the writers did with Azula, really. (I hadn't thought of the angle that her power was taken away! But it makes sense. She is no longer a trusted lieutenant who goes off and conquers cities, but a woman left to mind the house while Daddy Dearest goes out and burns countries to the ground. Actually Azula's story is very much one of her vs. sexism on all counts.) One of the things they did do right, though, was having her breakdown be violent rather than quiet sobbing into Zuko's shoulder or something.
I think Asuka is definitely one of those characters. I haven't seen the original series in years, and am still only halfway through the second Rebuild film, but oooh Asuka. I feel like I'm not well-equipped to deal with her, even now; I love her but it hurts.
no subject
Date: 2012-07-22 05:23 am (UTC)Whenever I'm reading a dudeslash fic and some awful drama goes down, I always say to myself "This wouldn't happen if you were ladies!" and I've only recently worked out that I say this not because ladies are better or because ladies don't have drama, but rather because the people who write ladyslash fic are not the kind of people who put up with stupid drama when they could be writing about cool things instead.
Could you better explain what this kind of drama looks like? It's so general that I'm having a hard time visualizing it, much less trying to think of plots you'd prefer where this doesn't happen. And could you please recommend any f/f fics (or m/m ones, if you've come across them) that lack the needless relationship drama you mentioned?
Also, something to ponder, I guess: Is it possible to show vulnerability in strong/"strong" female characters without it playing into problematic tropes like the one you described? If so, how? Or does portraying any vulnerability in female characters play into them on some level, no matter what?
Finally, I know this is OT, but thanks for introducing me to that blog. Specifically this and this. Obviously I don't agree with everything she says in either piece, but a lot of the issues she raises is good food for thought (the comments are definitely worth reading too), and some of the stuff she mentioned (esp. re: worldbuilding as useless trivia, cultural appropriation, near-mindless regurgitation of certain tropes and images/endless aping of Tolkien and the like, "geek" as personality instead of a hobby, etc.) point at some things that have always bothered me about fandom, and about the culture that surrounds media with sci-fi/fantasy elements as a whole. I'd be curious to know what you think of them, but I understand if you don't.
no subject
Date: 2012-07-22 03:29 pm (UTC)Control and Other Illusions is a favorite of mine cause
As for m/m fics without stupid drama, the one I would like to recommend as a perfect example of Real Drama Not Stupid Drama is
I think it's not portraying vulnerability or weakness that's problematic, but rather the problem lies in portraying female strength as a facade to be taken down in the presence of Our Main Dude. Especially in the ladies' willingness to cry on men's shoulders; I personally loathe it when I'm upset and people try to 'help' me, and I think that goes double for someone who actively puts on a show of strength in public.
I feel like it's the flip-side of manpain in some ways, only instead of staring at people's actual pain through an outsider's tears the author is fetishizing a lady's weakness and pain through someone else staring at her tears.
After typing all that, I don't think I have the mental energy to write up a proper response to those articles—I may have to come back later—but I do want to say that I've never really understood the whole "At least they're reading!" thing. Yes, kids are engaging in text-based communication. How much more sophisticated than audio or moving images. How much better trashy novels are than the internet. (Also, since one of the commenters mentioned him: ahaha R. Scott Bakker. I enjoyed his books because he can do great phrasing sometimes but they are sexist racist trash no matter how hard he and his fanboys try to pretend it's ~literature. And Esmenet deserved better as a character than to be stuck in that world with those dudes, which is why I stole her name and pretend she burned those countries to the ground and went off to live in an alter-Buddhist convent somewhere far, far away.)
I was going to come back earlier but I think slowly
Date: 2012-08-08 10:17 pm (UTC)She is no longer a trusted lieutenant who goes off and conquers cities, but a woman left to mind the house while Daddy Dearest goes out and burns countries to the ground.
And *I* hadn't thought of the sexism angle, but YOU ARE RIGHT! *nods a lot*
One of the things they did do right, though, was having her breakdown be violent rather than quiet sobbing into Zuko's shoulder or something.
Yes! And also, the breakdown wasn't because of vague, secret defenselessness but because her understanding of people is so terrible. (As
So now I don't think Azula is a strong but secretly defenseless woman at all.